|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
What Every Engineer Should Know About Business Communication (#0823) Engineers must possess a range of business communication skills that enable them to effectively communicate the purpose and relevance of their ideas, processes, and technical designs. This unique text is packed with practical advice that will improve your ability to market ideas, write proposals, generate enthusiasm for research, deliver presentations, explain a design, organize a project team, coordinate meetings, and create technical reports and specifications. It focuses on the three critical communication skills — speaking, writing, and listening — and demonstrates how to integrate a marketing strategy into every facet of engineering communication, including presentations, visual aids, proposals, technical reports, and even email and phone calls. Using situational examples, the book also illustrates how to use computers, graphics, and other engineering tools to effectively communicate with other professionals. |
|
SPC: Statistical Process Control in Injection Molding and Extrusion, 2nd Ed. (#0816) Successful implementation of Statistical Process Control requires an understanding of SPC as well as process know-how. Accordingly, this book aims to teach not only the principles of SPC but also basic injection molding and extrusion process technology. Contents: |
|
Nine-Language Dictionary of Polymers and Composites (#0821) Worldwide, research in polymers and composites is proceeding at an unprecedented rate and on diverse fronts. This dictionary provides a tool for translating research results, promotes the exchange of information, and enhances scientists’ understanding of the wealth of data published in different languages. Includes 7,000 terms translated into nine languages: English, Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, and Ukrainian. All polymer-related subject areas are covered, including chemistry, physical chemistry, physics, spectroscopy, microscopy, theoretical models, polymer-based composites and nanocomposites, polymer and composite processing, and related equipment, tools, and standard testing techniques. New research terms in composites and nanocomposites are also included. |
|
SPE Cliphanger (#0726) Keep your portable electronics right at hand wherever you need them with the SPE ClipHanger. The translucent gray, plastic SPE ClipHanger attaches securely to your cell phone, iPod, MP3, PDA, or pager with an industrial strength self-adhesive tab (tab can be removed with no sticky residue at a later date but is not reusable). Ergonomically designed, the thin yet exceptionally durable ClipHanger flexes to slip on to a pant belt loop, handbag strap, or backpack. No more hunting for your phone when it rings; it’s right at your fingertips, and the ClipHanger easily pulls free from the loop or strap where you’ve hung it to allow for quick use of your device. |
![]()
Because the Council hasn’t met since ANTEC, which I reviewed in the June newsletter, I’ve extracted items from recent SPE Executive Committee minutes. As always, I invite and welcome your feedback, insights, and input for governance.
Generational Planning
The SPE Executive Committee has been focusing on Generational Planning and the changing demographics for SPE. To that end, President-Elect Paul Andersen invited Sarah Sladek, a consultant, to talk about “Reaching Generations X, Y, and Z.” According to Ms. Sladek, Generations X and Y cover ages 14 to 45. Many associations like the SPE started in the 1600’s and have remained remarkably the same since then. These associations are starting to fade away now. “New Recruit Associations” target younger generations and are growing.
Her other observations included:
Generation Xers (born before 1982) have never known job security. They are self-sufficient. They have a need to be trusted.
Generation Y (born 1982-1995) have never known a world without (electronic) technology. They are globally minded. They are the most protected and pampered generation in history. They think that everything about current associations is obsolete or irrelevant. They want a lot of guidance and freedom.
Generation Z (born since 1996) are still young but will soon influence the markets. Associations are not expected to be present in their lives.
Marketing to Generations X and Y requires use of many more channels. Relationship building is critical (mentoring and sense of community).
Generations X and Y still need and want to belong to peer groups with a call to action, member benefits, involvement opportunities, and affordable pricing.
New-recruit organizations focus on students first. Students want to be mentored and have a community focus. Fee structures to transition to full membership are needed. The students want their dues to make a difference and support a larger cause.
Generations X and Y need respect and rewards. They are episodic volunteers – putting a lot of energy into a project and then taking a break. They want meetings with intentions that use technology when appropriate.
Websites should be very visual and feature young people. They need to provide useful information, relationship-building opportunities and innovative design.
X and Y generations do not want to pay their dues and climb the corporate ladder. They want freedom to work (work- life balance) and responsibility. They don’t want to work long hours – they work to live.
More information on this topic is available at www.limelight-associations.com.
President Elect Andersen and Executive Director Susan Oderwald are brainstorming ideas relative to the impact of this information on SPE.
2009 Budget Issues / Strategic Planning
SPE Membership is slowly eroding. The current North American economic situation may be accelerating this trend, particularly driven by the limited geographic diversity of SPE membership. 5314 members joined between 2004 and 2008 as a result of direct mail solicitation. Ms. Gebauer (SPE staff) is projecting a 9% reduction in membership each year through 2012. Our current membership revenue is $1.95 million; this will be reduced to $1.23 million by 2012 – a difference of $715,000. Membership in 2012 could be fewer than 12,000 people. This information must be taken into account during our budgeting and planning processes.
Tom Conklin, Director of New Business Development, is considering partnerships, outreach, and new business development. Since we do not market our products broadly beyond members, declining membership affects revenue from those products. Several new product efforts have been completed. Ongoing projects include the Plastipedia (awaiting introduction of the new website), and increased emphasis on technical volumes, including promotion in conjunction with e-Lives. Unfortunately, he does not foresee these efforts making up the $715,000 potential shortfall in membership revenue.
Governance
Barbara Arnold-Feret proposed removing the differentiation between non-North American and North American proxy rules. Ms. Arnold-Feret recommended that Council allow non-constituent proxies for all Sections and Divisions, that is, proxies could be designated for all Sections and Divisions, so long as they are SPE members at large.
The Executive Committee is considering allowing fully electronic participation in governance (Council) meetings, including voting. While audio conferencing has been offered in the past (with very limited participation), remote voting has not been available. The technology will be tested in the fall Council meeting.
2009 Budget Issues
Vice Presiden/Treasurer Barbara Arnold-Feret has worked with the Finance Committee to develop a budget proposal which will be considered at the October Council meeting. Significant variants from traditional budgets include the website development costs and the membership decline. Details will be available before the Council meeting via net-meetings.
Strategic Direction
Executive Director Susan Oderwald is leading a review of alternative strategic directions for SPE including dramatic structural changes, alliances with other societies, or even mergers with other societies. Various Executive Committee members were assigned to task teams to look at governance (Jim Griffing chair), member value (V. J. Boolani chair), communication technology (Scott Owens chair), and finance/administration (Barbara Arnold-Feret chair).
The SPE Foundation assets have been transferred back to SPE, rather than set aside in a separate corporation. That’s a good thing in that it avoids duplicate accounting, etc. The funds will still be used in the intended ways, but there will not be extra overhead, accounting, and separate auditing. The Foundation assets were separated out several years in anticipation of major growth of the fund and a need to separately manage the investments. The fund has not grown exponentially, and the separation simply increased administrative costs.
Awards
The SPE annual awards for 2009 will be somewhat altered (reduced in number) due to the co-location with NPE and other awards. A proposal is being developed.
Feedback
Again, please let me know (donna.s.davis@exxonmobil.com) if you have any questions or input. The next Council meeting will be mid October near the SPE Headquarters in Connecticut. Thanks for your continuing commitment to the SPE mission of ”promoting and providing knowledge and education of plastics globally”. And think about getting even more involved with section activities like the Polyolefins Conference.
![]()
William Sigworth, Research Fellow
Chemtura Corporation, Middlebury, CT USA
Abstract
The natural fiber plastic composite (NFPC) market offers exciting opportunities for both polyolefin resin manufacturers and additives suppliers. Wood and other natural fiber-filled polyolefins are being used in an increasing number of building and construction applications. This area of the composite market is projected to grow at a significantly higher rate than glass and mineral-filled polyolefins. This paper will discuss the North American WPC market, give an overview of how woodpolyolefin composites are formulated, and describe unmet needs and market trends.
Introduction
Readily available, low cost natural fibers are used at 30-85% loading in thermoplastics to prepare natural fiber-plastic composites. The natural fibers can be wood flour, wood fiber, or agricultural fibers such as hemp, flax, rice hulls, or nut shells. The predominate natural fiber in the North American market is wood flour, which is essentially a particulate material produced by grinding wood chips, scrap and/or dust into fiber with an aspect ratio of less than 3. Since wood and most agricultural fibers degrade at temperatures greater than 200°C, lower melting thermoplastics like polyethylene, polypropylene, and PVC must be used as the thermoplastic portion of the Wood-Plastic Composites (WPC). The most commonly used thermoplastic in the North American market is polyethylene since recycled waste streams of this polymer are readily available from post-consumer sources such as milk jugs, stretch wrap, and grocery bags.
The use of wood flour as a filler for plastics goes back to the early 20th century when it was added to a thermosetting phenolic resin to make “Bakelite.” One early application of Bakelite was for the gear shift knob on the 1916 Rolls Royce. Major market growth in WPC took place between the late 1980’s to 2000. Trex and AERT, two start-up companies, were the first to market decking products based on composites of wood flour and recycled polyethylene. A technology licensing company called Strandex began to sell their turn-key technology for direct extrusion of wood-PE composites for decking and railing applications. Andersen Corporation, the window manufacturer, produced window components based on their patented method for making wood-PVC blends. Compounders recognizing the market potential began to sell compounded pellets which end-users could extrude directly into finished products. Distribution of the finished decking products used the traditional lumber industry two-step process (distributor-lumber yard). By the turn of the century, the number of WPC companies manufacturing decking and railing products had grown significantly with both large corporations and small entrepreneurs becoming involved. Big box stores like Home Depot and Lowes saw the advantages of the WPC decking and began to market it in their stores. (1)
The Market
The building and construction as well as the automotive industries have become interested in NFPC. In the building and construction industry, these composites offer the following advantages over conventional lumber:
• Resistance to moisture, rot, and insects
• Less prone to splitting, warping, and splintering
• Requires less routine maintenance and lasts longer.
In automotive applications, the NFPC are less abrasive, lower weight and lower cost than either talc or glass fiber-filled composites. In both markets, they address environmental concerns about recycling plastic and wood by-product streams. For the auto industry, the natural fibers require less energy to produce and the composites are easier to recycle. For the building and construction segment, the WPC avoid the wood preservative chemicals used in pressure treating of conventional wood products.
The largest segment of WPC market in North America is in the building and construction industry, particularly the decking and railing segment. Here the predominant natural fiber is wood flour and the predominant polymer is polyethylene, derived from recycled, wide-spec or virgin sources. The Europeans have been quicker to adopt NFPC in the automotive area for applications like interior and trunk parts. The NFPC normally is used as a subsurface layer which is covered by fabric or another plastic layer in the end-use application.
Market Volume/Manufacturers
Attachment 1 shows the growth rate of WPC decking from 2000-2005 and projects growth through 2010. For 2005-2010, the estimated growth rate is approximately 20% per year. (2) This growth rate is in contrast to the 4-8% rate for mineral and glass-filled thermoplastic composites.
Table 1 gives a representative listing of the WPC manufacturers in North America. It is not meant to be all inclusive but rather to give a flavor of the size and types of companies that are manufacturing WPC decking and railing. Trex is widely recognized as the largest of the manufacturers. Other major producers are AERT, Timbertech, Fiber Composites, and LP. Strandex licensees are represented by LP, Universal Forest Products, Deceuninck NA, and Composatron.
Formulation: Wood & Resin Effects
Attachment 2 shows the effect of weight percent wood flour on the flexural modulus and strength of a polypropylene based composite. Modulus increased with wood flour content while strength decreased. The decrease in flex strength is attributed to the higher level of stress concentrating wood flour particles. The water uptake (attachment 3) increased with increasing wood flour level. Uptake levels with 60% wood flour were 50-80% higher than the levels at 40% wood flour. The increases in water uptake were not linear. The increase in wood flour loading from 50 to 60% had a larger effect on moisture uptake than did the increase from 40 to 50%.
The type of polyolefin resin in the WPC also affected properties. Attachment 4 compares HDPE and PP composites containing 40 weight percent wood flour. The polypropylene composite was stiffer and stronger than the HDPE composite but is harder to cut and nail. In addition to resin type, the molecular weight of the resin played a role in determine composite properties, Increasing the MFI (reducing the MW) of the HDPE in the 40% wood composite reduced the tensile and flexural strengths but had little effect on tensile or flexural moduli.
Formulation: Additives
Although they are generally used at low levels, additives play an important role in determining the processing and performance of WPC. Lubricants and other process aids can improve extrusion processing by increasing output and improving the appearance of the finished product. Other additives such as coupling agents, antimicrobials, antioxidants and UV stabilizers play a critical role in helping to improve initial properties and to resist change and deterioration resulting from exposure to various environments. Table 2 below lists the additives most commonly used in WPC, gives a range of their use levels, and describes their benefits.
In formulations containing several different additives, care should be taken to insure that there are no antagonistic interactions between these additives. One such antagonism is between maleic anhydride functionalized polyolefins coupling agents and metal stearate lubricants. The beneficial effects of the coupling agents on strength and water uptake can be completely negated by addition of as little as 0.3% metal stearate lubricant. Non-interfering lubricant packages are available for use in WPC formulations containing coupling agents. Other examples of antagonistic interactions between additives are the accelerating effect which zinc stearate has on the decomposition of azodicarbonamide foaming agents and the reaction between thioester stabilizers and hindered amine light stabilizers.
Issues
Issues facing the WPC industry can be related to cost, durability, and meeting building codes.
WPC deck boards sell for a 50-70% premium over comparable pressure treated wood boards. WPC products have been able to increase their share of the decking every year despite this price gap. However, the composite deck manufacturers must keep or reduce this price gap to further penetrate the market. (2) The run-up in the prices of both virgin and recycled resins that occurred after the 2005 hurricanes has made it difficult for manufacturers to maintain their pricing. (3) As a result there are opportunities for low cost resin replacement systems. Methods of reducing board weight such as foaming are also of interest.
Both short and long term durability are areas of continuing concern to WPC manufacturers. Originally, advertised as no maintenance, WPC decking is now being promoted as low maintenance. Despite this more realistic approach, changes in aesthetics continue to raise consumer issues. Color fade, which is 2-4 times greater than in siding and occurs after as little as 4 months field exposure, has resulted in a number of consumer complaints. (4) Attack by mold and mildew is also an issue as is staining due to tannins in the wood flour and from oil and beverage spills. Scratches created by furniture being dragged over the deck surface result in complaints as well.
WPC manufacturers must spend a great deal of time and effort getting code approvals for their products. Since the WPC industry is relatively new compared to siding, the codes are being revised frequently. Two examples illustrate this point.
Effective July, 2006, a revised version of the International Code Council-Evaluation Service’s AC-194 acceptance criteria for decking and railing systems was issued which includes a requirement on creep rupture.(5) This change requires re-qualification, a 6-9 month process, for any manufacturer wishing to maintain their AC-174 approvals.
A second example which could potentially result in a large change in the way that WPC decking and railing products are formulated is taking place in the western part of North America. Population growth combined with a dwindling supply of land for residential construction have resulted in an increased number of homes being built at the borders between the urban and wildland environments. The so-called Urban-Wildland Interface (UWI) is known for having a higher frequency and severity of wild fires. Expenditures for fire fighting in these areas are on the increase. Legislative action is being taken to limit the financial burden of these fires. California has passed legislation that will be effective in 2008. Testing criteria that will ensure compliance with the California legislation are under development. (6, 7) Colorado and British Columbia are considering similar laws.
Improving the flame retardancy of decking is one goal of the legislation. Ignition of decking is a major concern because of the hazard to the habitable structure. Most decks are configured in such a way that they are threatened by two potential sources of ignition: burning embers from above and burning brush under the deck. New building codes will almost certainly require deck boards which are flame retardant. The inability to develop a WPC decking product that meets the UWI fire safety standards will negatively impact market growth. Chemtura estimates suggest that flame retardant WPC decking could comprise 10-15% of the NA market.
Conclusions
The WPC market offers opportunities for both polyolefin resin manufacturers and additive suppliers.
The market is growing at a much higher rate than the glass and mineral filled-polyolefin areas. The sales volume for WPC decking and railing is projected to increase by over 2.5 times between 2005 and 2010 reaching $2.5 billion. Other building and construction applications such as privacy fencing, windows and doors, trim boards, and siding are either currently entering the marketplace or under development.
Additives are required to solve unmet needs of the market. Many WPC manufacturers need technical assistance to resolve these issues. Solutions must be cost effective and must be demonstrated at production extrusion rates and/or in the real world environment.
The WPC market also creates an outlet for plastic and wood waste streams. Participation in this market is an environmentally friendly course of action.
Acknowledgements
Thanks are extended to Dr. John Wefer, Mr. Paul Hinckley, and Mr. Roger Cheney for help in preparing this paper and to Chemtura Corporation for permission to present it.
References
1. C. Clemons, “Woodfiber-Plastic Composites in the United States – History and Current and Future Markets,” Forest Products Journal, vol. 52 (6), pp. 1-1 through 1-7, June, 2002.
2. Matt Griswold, “Decks do well despite housing stat slowdown,” Plastics News, October 2, 2006.
3. A. DeRosa & M. Griswold, “Resin Cost a hot topic in the building sector,” Plastics News, January 23, 2006.
4. M. Griswold, “Wood-plastic firms working at fixing problems,” Plastics News, October 30, 2006.
5. ICC-ES AC-174, “Acceptance Criteria for Deck Board Span Rating and Guardrail Systems,” ICC-ES, Whittier, CA, Approved June, 2006, Effective July 1, 2006.
6. Urban Wildland Interface Building Test Standards 12-7A-5, “Fire Resistive Standards for Decks and Other Ancillary Structures,” California Building code, Chapter 7
7. ASTM E108-05, “Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Roof Coverings,” Published 2005.






![]()
Location: HESS
Date: August 11, 2008
Voting Attendees: |
Brandon Cleary |
Glenn Rasberry |
Non-Voting Attendees: |
Bill Diecks |
Noreen McCarthy |
| 1. | Pre-meeting Discussion - Mention of SPE “financial crisis”. Appoint Bill Diecks to lead committee to collect ideas, propose solutions to increase involvement, membership. | ||
| 1.1. | Ayush suggested SPE ambassadors make on-site visits to explain benefits, encourage participation. Suzanne said this was tried 5 years ago, but companies declined participation. | ||
| 1.2. | 1.2. In-person meeting and involvement key to getting started with regular participation. Get them involved in small volunteering activities. | ||
| 1.3. | 1.3. Noreen – ThomasNet has Facebook blog feature. Can set up group for Plastic Engineers. Do press releases linked to major search engines. | ||
| 1.4. | 1.4. Jordan – Suggested using multiple format contacting methods. Email, phone, etc., not just repeating same method. | ||
| 1.5. | 1.5. Kurt – Gen X & Y get together to have fun, not learn. Our meetings need to be planned accordingly. | ||
| 2. | Call to Order at 5:20 – Jeff Applegate. | ||
| 2.1. | Jeff motion to call, Kurt seconded. All approved. | ||
| 3. | Roll Call – Harish Sangani | ||
| 3.1. | Bill Talbott motion to approve minutes from June meeting, Kurt seconded. All approved. | ||
| 4. | President’s Report – Jeff Applegate | ||
| 4.1. | Via email, had distributed final proposed budgets for all committees for the 2008-2009 program year. | ||
| 5. | Treasurer’s Report – Glenn Rasberry | ||
| 5.1. | As of July 31, 2008, had | ||
| 5.1.1. | $106,517.55 in savings account, which had earned $1,428.07 in interest YTD. | ||
| 5.1.2. | $10,905.95 in checking account, with a total of $66,267.77 in checks written during July. Over $63k of that was disbursements to our POC’08 partners and SPE International. Remainder was for a few scholarship and awards, and reimbursements for meeting costs. | ||
| 5.1.3. | Total of $117,423.50 in the two accounts. | ||
| 5.2. | Still waiting for tax reports from SPE Int’l. | ||
| 5.3. | Donna requested separate tabulation of PO Conf. entries from section entries for future reports. | ||
| 5.4. | Donna mentioned that education budget submitted will spend about $20,000 in excess of projected income from PO Conf. Suzanne pointed out that golf outing and a few other activities generate some profit, included in budget, & will reduce the overall shortfall. | ||
| 5.5. | Section budget motion to approve as submitted – motion by Donna, seconded by Brandon. All approved. | ||
| 6. | Program Committee – Brandon Cleary | ||
| 6.1. | Sept. outing at Minute Maid Astros game. Committed to 200 tickets, more should be available if needed. | ||
| 6.2. | Suzanne asked for email addresses of contacts who are not SPE members. Send emails to them to invite to game / meeting. | ||
| 6.3. | BOD to contact their existing SPE contacts to personally invite. Remainder of list to be divided among members for followup. | ||
| 6.4. | Need better publicizing of our section’s accomplishments and goals at each meeting / event. | ||
| 7. | Newsletter Committee – Kurt Hayden | ||
| 7.1. | Discussion about how to revise distribution of newsletter so that it is more dynamic. Will discuss with publisher (Joe Geiman) | ||
| 7.2. | Advertising income is barely in excess of costs so far. | ||
| 7.3. | Comments from sponsors that PO Conference advertising is more effective than newsletter. | ||
| 8. | Education Committee – Marti Husti | ||
| 8.1. | (no report) | ||
| 9. | PO Committee – Emery Jorgensen for Don Witenhafer | ||
| 9.1. | Have lost some major sponsors (Dow, Chemtura). Will need help replacing them. | ||
| 10. | Public Interest Committee – | ||
| 10.1. | Jeff volunteered Noreen McCarthy for assistance in this role. | ||
| 11. | Membership Committee – Gerry Fusco | ||
| 11.1. | (no report) | ||
| 11.2. | Bill asked if SPE Int’l has discounted rate for first-year members, online-only membership, or some other lower cost options. Alternate membership options for sections in sparsely populated areas. | ||
| 12. | Housing Committee – Emery Jorgensen | ||
| 12.1. | HESS suitable for regular and BOD meetings. Very good facilities, flexible menu or buffet options. Requested feedback on using HESS for future meetings. Generally positive comments from meeting attendees. | ||
| 13. | Other Business | ||
| 13.1. | Councilor Report – SPE HQ building too big for our needs and is being put up for sale. Empty space not being fully rented out. Reduced headcount justified by reduced editorial need since Wiley will be publishing Plastic Engineering. | ||
| 13.2. | . Jeff made special recognition for Donna’s effort as President last year. | ||
| 14. | Adjournment | ||
| 14.1. | Kurt motioned for adjournment, Donna seconded. All approved, motion carried. | ||
![]()
The final payment of the $25,000 Endowed Scholarship was accepted at TTU on May 21, 2008 in Lubbock. The scholarship honors South Texas Section Education Committee Chairman, Mark Demark. The formal name of the scholarship is: Mark Demark – Society of Plastics Engineers, South Texas Section Endowed Scholarship. The endowment will generate funds that will provide scholarships to Texas Tech students who are pursuing polymer related studies.

From L to R are: Miao Hu, Gengxin Zhang, Naz Karim, Rajesh Khare, Dean Pamela Eibeck, Jin Hua Wang and Po-Han Lin.
![]()
This year’s event, Oct. 8-9, will be in Bartlesville, Oklahoma near the Chevron-Phillips Plastics Center. The theme is: “Building Blocks for the Future.” Technical sessions include: an industry overview, materials, applications and
machinery advancements in packaging, industrial and automotive, material handling, parison/preform optimization and even a much anticipated session on legislation and sustainability.
You may have customers, prospective clients or colleagues who may be interested in attending the conference or even participating as an exhibitor/sponsor.
Register by September 21st to take advantage of the discount.
A current copy of the program schedule can be found at the SPE Blow Molding Division Website:
http://www.4spe.org/communities/divisions/d30.php
![]()
Over the summer, the Education Committee kept active by putting together the framework for the Section expenditures on education activities during the coming year. The Section Board of Directors met during this period as well, and the Ed Committees budget was presented, fine tuned at three separate Board meetings, and approved at the August, 2008 meeting.
The Section approved a budget of $82,250.00 to be spent on Educational activities during 2008-2009. 97% of funds approved will go directly to students at universities, or secondary education facilities. The Section is fortunate to have a cadre of willing volunteers on the Ed Committee who commit their time and efforts to keep our administrative costs to the bare minimum. Even more fortunate is that through the annual Polyolefins Conference, and Padula Memorial Golf Outing, we are able to generate funds that can be used for educational purposes by South Texas Section schools.
The coming years funds will be disbursed in the following areas:
| 1. | Seven Section sponsored Student Chapters – Frank Padula Awards: | $14,000.00 |
| 2. | Annual Scholarship Award to six Universities with active Student Chapters: | $18,000.00 |
| 3. | Technology and equipment grants to Texas universities: | $19,750.00 |
| 4. | Awards for local students participating in Houston Science Fair and Essay Contests: | $13,000.00 |
| 5. | Downpayment for Endowed scholarship at Lamar University: | $12,500.00 |
| 6. | Contingency of $5,000 with 50% already envisioned for new Student Chapters being formed in the local area. | $ 5,000.00 |
| TOTAL APPROVED BUDGET: | $87,250.00 |
Initial disbursements have already gone out to some of the schools who are being supported. Throughout the year all funds will be spent. In addition to the Section education budget, the Polyolefins Conference also directly supports education activities during the conference. Over $28,000.00 in direct and indirect funds were expended on students during the 2008 Polyolefins Conference. The Section realizes that providing support and encouragement to young people to get involved in our industry can only bode well for its future well being. The Education Committee members want to thank the Section Board of Directors, and South Texas SPE members for the ongoing support that they provide our committee’s efforts. Our ability to give back to the community is one of the many reasons that the South Texas Section continues to be successful.

Dale Walker Endowed Scholarship at TAMU

Frank Padula Endowed Scholarship at UH

Henry Kahn Endowed Scholarship at TAMU
![]()
President’s Message
Plastics Info from the Library
Bulletin Board
Breakfast Bunch Golf Outing 2008
Books, Etc.
Councilor’s Report
Technical Article – Wood Plastics Composites
Board Minutes
SPE Endowment
Annual Blow Molding Conference
Education Committee
Section Meetings September 8 , 2008 October 13 November 10 December 8 January 12, 2009 February 22-25 March 9 April 20 May 11 |
Section Officers
President – Jeff Applegate
Blackwell Plastics
5606 Cavanaugh Street, Houston, TX 77021
713.643.6577 • jeff.applegate@blackwellplastics.com
President-Elect – Brandon Cleary
Texas Polymers Inc.
182 Burgundy Court, The Woodlands, TX 77384
281.229.4049 • brandon@texaspolymers.com
Vice President – Kurt Kayden
Greene Tweed & Co.
1930 Rankin Road, Houston, TX 77073
281.765.4500 • khayden@gtweed.com
Secretary – Harish Sangani
Poly Clean Technologies
4709 Highway 36 S. Suite #12, Rosenberg, TX 77471
832.595.9660 • harishsangani8@msn.com
Treasurer – Glenn Rasberry
Ametek/Westchester Plastics
206 A Hawthorne, Houston, TX 77006
713.899.0142 • glenn.rasberry@ametek.com
Councilor & Past President – Donna Davis
ExxonMobil Chemical Company
5200 Bayway Drive, Baytown, TX 77522-5200
281.834.2036 • donna.s.davis@exxonmobil.com
Committee Chairpersons
Advertising – Suzanne Biggs
281.240.0202 • sbiggs@tpcplastic.com
Education – Martin Husti
281.655.1919 • marty@tiaero.com
Golf Outing – Lynette Russo
281.481.9100 • lynnette@bapoly.com
Housing – Emery Jorgensen
713.827.1455 • emery@jorgensonmachinery.com
Newsletter –Kurt Hayden
281.765.4500 • khayden@gtweed.com
Membership – Gerry Fusco
713.594.7273 • Gafusco@aol.com
Past President – Donna Davis
281.834.2036 • donna.s.davis@exxonmobil.com
Polyolefins 2009 – Don Witenhafer
979.693.6836 • witenhafer2@cs.com
Technical Chair – Bob Portnoy
281.834.2899 • robert.c.portnoy@exxonmobil.com
Public Interest & Special Events – Noreen McCarthy
404.460.7315 • noreen@ictexas.com
Technical Program – Brandon Cleary
281.229.4049 • brandon@texaspolymers.com
Board Members
Paul Banks – 281.578.1440
paulbanks@fsicorp.com
Gerald Fusco – 281.225.4476
Gafusco@aol.com
Ray Johannessen – 281.252.5550
R.Johannessen@crodausa.com
Emery Jorgensen – 713.827.1455
emery@jorgensenmachinery.com
Mike McMahon – 713.495.6766
michael.mcmahon@polyone.com
Rajen Patel – 979.238.2254
rmpatel@down.com
William Talbott – 281.218.6305
whtalbott@cs.com
Tom Walsh – 713.245.7403
ts_walsh@sbcglobal.net
Gerry Wissler – 817.944.5135
gewissler@att.net
Don Witenhafer – 979.693.6836
witenhaferd@cs.com
Alternate Board Members
A Yush Bafna – 979.238.9060
aabafna@dow.com
Shawn Smith – 832.618.1500
ssmith@vertecpolymers.com
