February 2010 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SPE Events Through October 2010 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Title |
Date |
Type |
Plastic Conversion Processes: Selecting the Correct Process for Your Design - Part 1 |
February 3, 2010 |
Webinar |
Failure Analysis of Plastic and Rubber Materials: Molecular Weight & Additive Analysis - Part 4 |
February 4, 2010 |
Webinar |
Plastic Conversion Processes: Selecting the Correct Process for Your Design - Parts 1 & 2 |
February 10, 2010 |
Webinar |
The Promise of Bioplastics – State of the Technology, Feedstock, and Commercial Landscape |
February 11, 2010 |
Webinar |
February 17, 2010 |
Webinar |
|
February 21, 2010 9:00am - February 24, 2010 5:00pm |
Conference - Industry |
|
Materials Challenges in Alternative & Renewable Energy Sources |
February 21, 2010 9:00am - February 25, 2010 5:00pm |
Conference - Industry |
Addressing the Myths of Loss-in-Weight Feeders in Your Process |
March 3, 2010 |
Webinar |
March 8, 2010 8:30am - |
Seminar |
|
March 8, 2010 8:30am - |
Conference - Industry |
|
March 8, 2010 9:00am - |
Conference - Industry |
|
March 17, 2010 |
Webinar |
|
Polymer Degradation, Stabilization, and Failure Analysis - Part 1 |
March 18, 2010 |
Webinar |
Polymer Degradation, Stabilization, and Failure Analysis - Part 2 |
March 25, 2010 |
Webinar |
April 6, 2010 9:00am - |
Conference – Industry |
|
April 11, 2010 9:00am - |
Conference – Industry |
|
April 21, 2010 |
Webinar |
|
April 22, 2010 8:30am - |
Conference – Industry |
|
May 16, 2010 8:30am - |
Conference - Industry |
|
Intellectual Property Basics for Chemists, Engineers & Managers, Part 1 |
May 26, 2010 |
Webinar |
Intellectual Property Basics for Chemists, Engineers & Managers, Part 2 |
May 27, 2010 |
Webinar |
June 15, 2010 8:30am - |
Conference – Industry |
|
September 7, 2010 9:00am - September 10, 2010 5:00pm |
Conference – Industry |
|
September 13, 2010 9:00am - September 15, 2010 5:00pm |
Conference – Industry |
|
September 14, 2010 9:00am - September 16, 2010 5:00pm |
Conference – Industry |
|
September 18, 2010 8:30am - September 21, 2010 5:00pm |
Conference - Industry |
|
October 18, 2010 9:00am - October 20, 2010 5:00pm |
Conference – Industry |
|
October 18, 2010 9:00am - October 20, 2010 5:00am |
Seminar |
|
November 10, 2010 9:00am - November 11, 2010 5:00pm |
Conference – Industry |
|
October 3, 2011 9:00am - October 7, 2011 5:00pm |
Conference - Industry |
|
![]()
The Houston Public Library on McKinney has resources on plastics and polymers. Check out their catalog at www.hpl.lib.tx.us. If you are not near the McKinney location, you can arrange to pick up your books at your local branch.
The Fondren Library at Rice University has the most complete collection of books on plastics and polymers. This is also a prime resource for patent and trademark information, as well as other US Government documents. You cannot check out books there unless you join Fondren Library [$50], but you can arrange for books to be sent to your library by inter-library loan. Use their catalog at http://library.rice.edu/.
The next best place to browse is at the MD Anderson Library at the University of Houston central campus. South Texas Section has donated many plastics books to this library. If you plan ahead, you can get a TexShare library card from a library where you are a member, which will allow you to check out books from any U of H library. Their catalog is at www.library.uh.edu/.
![]()
|
|
Additives for Polyolefins Michael Tolinski, 304 pages, Jul-2009 ISBN-13: 978-0-8155-2051-1 $150.00 This book focuses on the polyolefin additives that are currently important in the plastics industry, alongside new additives of increasing interest, such as nanofillers and environmentally sustainable materials. As much as possible, each chapter emphasizes the performance of the additives in the polymer, and the value each relevant additive brings to polypropylene or polyethylene. Where possible, similar additives are compared by capability and relative cost. With major sections for each additive function, this book provides a highly practical guide for engineers and scientists creating and using polyolefin compounds, who will find in this book a wealth of detail and practical guidance. This unique resource will enable them to make practical decisions about the use of the various additives, fillers, and reinforcements specific to this family of materials. Contents: |
|
|
Flame Retardants for Plastics and Textiles: Practical Applications An overview of flame retardants that are either in commercial use or in advanced stages of market development, reviewed polymer-by-polymer, supplemented by a brief overview of mode of action and interaction. It is more of a “how-to-do-it” book than an academic study. As such, it names trademarked materials as well as products in active stages of development, gives suggestions for selecting among alternatives, provides suggested formulations, and offers a starting point for the compounder or plastics fabricator to pass commercial flammability requirements. Contents: |
|
|
Plastics Manufacturing Systems Engineering: A Practical Approach Plastics manufacturing is a highly interdisciplinary endeavor requiring knowledge related to materials science, physics, engineering, and management. Because of this diversity, the plastics process engineer interacts with many stakeholders, including customers, designers, materials suppliers, machine builders, mold/die suppliers, systems integrators, operators, quality engineers, and managers. With so many stakeholders involved, it isn’t surprising that many plastics manufacturing processes are not precisely engineered systems. The resulting processes can be poorly designed, requiring too much investment to achieve too little productivity. This book was written to educate and support plastics processing engineers, but is also highly useful to others involved with plastics manufacturing who are performing process development, research, and even machinery design. It uses a manufacturing systems engineering approach to provide guidance about plastics manufacturing as an integrated system with broadly applicable analysis of the underlying subsystems. Contents: |
|
|
Lawsuit!: Reducing the Risk of Product Liability for Manufacturers Reduce your exposure to civil lawsuits. Addressing product liability and laws in both the U.S. and internationally, this book helps product manufacturers and engineers develop and implement proactive processes that can reduce liability concerns and potential lawsuits. It discusses preventive measures in the engineering, development, and manufacturing of products and explains the procedures and processes manufacturers must have in place to reduce the likelihood of liability – as well as to provide the best defense in case of a lawsuit. |
|
|
Qualifications, Startups and Tryouts of Injection Molds The truth is you don’t need fancy gizmos to do scientific molding. All you need is a machine where you can read the settings, an accurate weigh scale, and a computer. A universal setup guide only needs a little homework on your part to read each machine’s manual and the ability to read the settings. If you had a few days and an engineering textbook you could actually write these spreadsheets yourself! It is NOT MAGIC. This CD uses a practical, down to earth, easy to use approach to bringing a mold on-line and producing consistently good parts. CD contains both filled in tutorials showing what inputs are required and worksheets for you to fill in. CD Contents: Spreadsheets in Microsoft Excel .xls files: Optimum fill calculation – the melt viscosity curve, Gate Freeze off, Cooling time, Cavity balance for multi cavity tools, Cp CpK calculator, Universal setup sheet – includes how to translate from one machine to another, a waterline map, Runner size optimization, and a calculator to determine your process window settings. Microsoft Word .doc Files: Mold Check List, Mold History / Maintenance forms. The text includes a complete explanation of the experiments to optimize your injection molding cycle. Other Topics are: |
|
|
Plastic Conversion Processes: A Concise and Applied Guide Many books describe a single plastic-conversion process, like injection molding, but until now, none has described and compared several processes. This book provides a basic overview of seven conversion processes used in the industry. These processes account for more than 97% of all plastic products. Each chapter begins with a process attribute table to serve as a quick guide. The particular conversion process is then briefly described, along with a short history. To better explain each process, sections detailing equipment, tooling, and materials have been added. Also included are sections on design guidelines and on how to identify which process was used to manufacture a plastic part. Contents: |
|
|
Mixing and Compounding of Polymers: Theory and Practice, 2nd Edition Finally available in its second edition, this classic monograph covers everything from the basic principles to the various practical applications of state-of-the-art mixing and compounding. It discusses the basic mixing mechanisms encountered in polymer processing; the latest results in modeling, flow simulation and visualization, and scale-up rules for the most important batch and continuous mixers; the properties of various additives used in the plastics and rubber industry and their effects on the properties of the compound; working principles and practices for reactive polymer compounding; compatibilization mechanisms applicable to blends and composites; mixing practices in the current commercial mixing devices; key aspects of mixing at nanoscale; and scale-down of mixing equipment and fundamentals of microfluidics. Contents: Part I: Mechanisms and Theory Part II: Mixing Equipment - Modeling, Simulation, Visualization Part III: Material Consideration, Properties and Characterization Part IV: Mixing Practices |
|
|
Injection Molding: Fundamentals and Applications This book surveys the state of the science and technology of the injection molding process. It represents a comprehensive, balanced mix of practical and theoretical aspects for a wide range of injection molding applications. The authors of the 21 chapters are experts and leaders in their respective areas of specialization in the injection molding field. While it is not possible to cover all aspects of such a dynamic growing field, readers should find sufficient information and background to become acquainted, at various levels of depth, with key components of the science and technology of injection molding. Contents: |
ANTEC™@NPE 2009 Conference Proceedings - Thumb Drive In Chicago in 2009, ANTEC® (Annual Technical Conference), sponsored by the Society of Plastics Engineers, celebrated its 67th year of excellence. The largest peer-reviewed technical conference serving the plastics industry, ANTEC® is perfectly positioned to help the plastics specialist achieve new levels of professional development. Order the ANTEC® 2009 proceedings on thumb drive or CD-ROM. Includes 700+ papers detailing the latest developments in: Alloys and Blends, Applied Rheology, Automotive, Biopolymers, Blow Molding, Color and Appearance, Composites, Decorating and Assembly, Electrical and Electronic, Engineering Properties and Structure, Extrusion, Failure Analysis and Prevention, Flexible Packaging, Injection Molding, Joining of Plastics and Composites, Marketing and Management, Medical Plastics, Mold Making and Mold Design, Nano/Micro Molding, Plastic Pipe & Fittings, Plastics in Building and Construction, Plastics Environmental, Polymer Analysis, Polymer Modifiers and Additives, Process Monitoring and Control, Product Design and Development, Radiation Processing of Polymers, Rotational Molding, Thermoforming, Thermoplastic Elastomers, Thermoplastic Materials and Foams, Thermoset, and Vinyl Plastics. |
|
Injection Molding - Thumb Drive Injection Molding Titles Include: Shear Induced Imbalances and MeltFlipper® Technology, by John P. Beaumont, Penn State Erie & Beaumont Technologies, Inc. The Warpage Simulation with In-mold Constraint Effect in Injection Molding, by Dr. Venny Yang, CoreTech System Co., Ltd. The Investigation of Flow Behavior of Polymeric Melts in Water Assisted Injection Molding, by Dr. Chao-Tsai Huang, CoreTech System Co., Ltd. Injection Molding of Woodfiber Plastics Composites, by Michael Burgoyne State of the Art of Electric injection Molding, by M. Barr Klaus, Electric Injection Services, Inc. Mold Ejector Pin Melt Flow Volume Sensor, by Fred Buja, FjB PlasTechnology Water up to 400°F – The Best Way To Heat up Your Mold, by Anna Birkhofer, consultant Asia Tooling and Molding: How To Be Successful, D.B. "Dusty" Rhodes, Waypoint Bellwether, Inc. It Is as Easy To Be an Injection Molding Compounder as It Is To Be an Injection Molder, by Peter Lipp, Krauss-Maffei Corporation Effect of Injection Molding Process Parameters on the Morphology and Quality of Microcellular Foams, by Jingyi Xu Microcellular Injection Molding of Polylactide-Montmorillonite Nanocomposites, by Sarah Gong, Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee |
![]()
Location: by Teleconference
Date: January 12, 2010
Voting Attendees: |
Kurt Hayden |
Bill Talbott |
Non-Voting Attendees: |
Bill Diecks |
Iman Bahrani |
| 1. | Call to Order at 4:05 PM – Jeff Applegate. Mentioned SPE anti-trust policy. | ||
| 2. | Roll Call – Harish Sangani. Motion to approve minutes from December 14, 2009 Motion by: Don Witenhafer. Second by: Bill Talbott. All approved |
||
| 3. | President’s Report – Jeff Applegate | ||
| 3.1. | Main purpose of teleconference BOD meeting was to discuss status and remaining preparations for PO2010 conference. | ||
| 4. | Treasurer’s Report – Terry Vermaas | ||
| 4.1. | Total of $148,958.49 in Section accounts as of 12/31/09, of which $44,035.49 was in the checking account. | ||
| 4.2. | Have not yet contacted SPE Int’l about participation in their investment account. | ||
| 4.3. | Bill Diecks expressed some concern about access to Section funds if Int’l is having financial difficulties. Need to have access and liquidity for Section’s activities. | ||
| 4.4. | Suzanne Biggs mentioned that Charles Schwab has some short-term investment options yielding around 2% interest rates. | ||
| 4.5. | Some discussion about various options to achieve higher interest rates with different financial institutions around the country, but that was countered by some hesitation about the treasurer’s liabilities and responsibilities if tasked with achieving higher rates of return on investment. | ||
| 5. | Polyolefins Committee – Don Witenhafer | ||
| 5.1. | 61 registrations so far, which is ahead of registration levels at similar points in prior conferences. | ||
| 5.2. | Robert Portnoy – some problems with online uploading of technical papers. Program chairs need to clean up these issues in order to facilitate preparation of conference CD-ROM. | ||
| 5.3. | Renee Colyer may have proposal from hotel ready regarding contract and reduced risk options for committing to PO 2011 conference at same hotel. | ||
| 6. | Program Committee – Kurt Hayden | ||
| 6.1. | 15 paid registrants for today’s molding seminar with RJG. | ||
| 7. | Education Committee – | ||
| 7.1. | Suzanne Biggs – not yet issued call for volunteers to run Essay Contest. | ||
| 7.2. | Iman Bahrani – U of H downtown students ready for support from SPE-STX. Is $1000 seed money available? Jeff Applegate – Education Committee has authority to spend money. Suzanne said $2000 budgeted for scholarships, $800 for student section, so that much can be distributed to them when needed. | ||
| 8. | Young Professionals Committee – Ayush Bafna | ||
| 8.1. | Have contacted people in several major resin suppliers to help promote to young professionals. Plan to have Y.P. meeting somewhere in Houston area once/quarter. Initial meeting in late January / early February. | ||
| 8.2. | Jeff Applegate – Society of Petroleum Engineers has an active Young Professionals program. Will forward info to Ayush. | ||
| 9. | Adjournment at 4:35PM. Motion by: Don Witenhafer. Second by: Bill Talbott. All approved. |
||
![]()
James J. Bal
Ferro Corporation
Engineered Plastics Products
Stryker, OH
Abstract
Polyolefins are utilized frequently in durable products that call for extended life in a variety of environmental conditions. Many of these products require color and almost all require and enhanced degree of resistance to the stresses of an exterior environment. The selection of plastic colorants that can withstand harsh environmental conditions is critical to ensuring the long term appearance of a polyolefin based durable product. Likewise, the correct choice of plastic additives for exterior applications must be made in order to ensure acceptable product appearance and performance over time.
This paper examines key design considerations for durable polyolefin products in terms of additive selection. Special consideration is made in terms of selecting colorants that are considered non-toxic. A practical example is presented.
Background
Polyolefins, and in particular polyethylene and polypropylene, are the most widely utilized plastics in the world today. The blend of a robust mechanical and physical properties palette, excellent chemical resistance, and reasonable cost for this polymer class makes it a prudent choice for use in most durable goods applications. Specifically, polyolefins are an excellent choice as a material to use in applications that require extended exposure in outdoor conditions. Polypropylene and polyethylene are routinely utilized in the manufacture of such items as refuse containers, play equipment, decorative shutters, and recreational vehicles.
Outdoor durables encounter a wide variety of material stress brought on by exposure to the environment. Weather conditions vary around the world so upfront design of a polyolefin durable (herein referred to as durable) sufficient to perform in various climates if often required. The main components of the weather that cause degradation of any polymer are temperature, moisture, wind, dust, pollutants, and sunlight [1].
A durable will have a surface temperature resultant of several factors including the surface finish, color, heat capacity, and thermal conductivity of the material used to make the durable. A decrease in thermal oxidative stability over time can result from consistently high surface temperatures. Frequent exposure to precipitation and high humidity can accelerate the deterioration of the surface of a durable. Wind transfers dust and pollutants that cover the surface of a durable. While some limited protective effects from particulate coatings exist, some dusts and volatile pollutants like sulfur dioxide can initiate or catalyze chemical reactions on a durable.
Much has been written about the effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on polymeric material and in particular polyolefins. While UV radiation still comprises a relatively small portion of the total radiation found in sunlight that reaches the earth’s surface, the acceleration of the deterioration in the earth’s ozone layer over the last several decades dictates that subsequently outdoor durables will be exposed to even higher doses of UV radiation than previously realized.
Though polyolefins are suitable polymers to use in outdoor durable applications they must be used in concert with weatherfast, heat resistant colorants to maintain color. Dyes are not recommended for use in polyolefin applications because they will be soluble and migrate out of the matrix.
Most inorganic pigments meet the required performance criteria for durable applications. These colorants are also chemically stable in general and are insoluble in polyolefins so they will not migrate. Their drawbacks include inferior intensity and brightness in comparison to organic pigments of the same color.
Some organic pigments can effectively be used in durable applications. The fastness properties of organic pigments vary widely so care must be taken in selecting types that meet exposure thresholds. Organic pigments will usually have greater color strength and brightness than the inorganic varieties due to the organic pigments relatively larger surface area and higher molar extinction coefficients. Solar radiation absorbed on the surface of organic pigments will eventually lead to the deterioration of the pigment. The nature of the chemical bonds in organic pigments is what makes them more susceptible to photodegradation than inorganic pigments. In most instances the higher the degree of surface area the quicker the deterioration of the organic colorant [2].
It is helpful to review some of the specific pigment types suitable for use in polyolefin durable applications.
The carbon black colorants are the best pigments for improving the long term performance of an exterior durable. Besides providing a pristine black color, carbon blacks also absorb all light and impede the detrimental effect of UV radiation on durables. Carbon blacks are also effective anti-oxidants, helping to prevent oxidation of durables in environments with long term heat exposure.
Titanium dioxide is the most widely used white colorant. The rutile crystalline form is preferred over that of the anatase form in durable applications since the former has a higher refractive index that results in better opacity or hiding strength. The rutile form has better weathering properties as well. A surface treatment can improve these weathering properties and prevents yellowing of the titanium dioxide in the presence of phenolic antioxidant additives [3].
Titanium dioxide strongly absorbs light in the near-UV portion of the spectrum (200 nm – 380 nm) so it does provide some degree of protection for a polyolefin matrix. Barium sulphate, zinc sulfide, and antimony oxide are examples of other inorganic white colorants that can be utilized in durables. These pigments are often utilized since they effectively reflect light in the ultraviolet region.
Inorganic pigments suitable for exterior durable applications in the blue to green color space include ultramarine blue, cobalt aluminates, and chrome oxide. Special care should be taken in the use of ultramarine blue pigments in durable applications as these colorants have poor chemical resistance in environments where acidic pollutants are present. In the organic pallet, copper phthalocyanine blue and green pigments are commonly used in exterior application since they are found to have good weatherfastness properties. They are also relatively inexpensive when compared to the inorganic blue and green pigments.
Many plastics converters prefer to utilize colorants other than those that present potential health hazards. Colorants of these types are commonly restricted by legislation that limits their use. Many of the most weatherfast and heat stable inorganic pigments contain significant levels of heavy metals, specifically hexavalent chromium, lead, mercury, and cadmium, so that the benefits derived from using them in custom color applications is offset by the extra measures required to ensure safe handling and disposal in converters’ production facilities.
Chromate yellow and orange pigment types generally exhibit excellent fastness and provide bright, strong shades of color in durables. However, legislation restricting their use in only applications where the pigments are deemed essential to end use performance makes them undesirable in most cases. More recent pigment technology, the synthetic rare earth pigments like cerium sulfide fill the same color space, have no toxicity concerns, and deliver the same fastness properties as the chromates.
Iron oxide and mixed metal oxide pigments can also be used in place of the heavy metal pigments. These colorants come in various colors from yellow and green to red as well as black and brown. Synthetic versions of these inorganic pigments are most often used as the purity and physical form can be controlled to a larger degree. These pigments demonstrate excellent durability and UV screening capabilities. They typically cost less than the lead based pigments and in comparison have very few toxicity concerns making them suitable colorants for durable applications.
Though the mixed metal forms show improved color strength and brightness over some of the basic iron oxides, the major drawback of all metal oxide inorganic pigments is their low color intensity and relatively dull appearance, which cannot be compensated for by higher dosing.
Organic colorants such as diaryl pyrrolopyrrole (DPP) pigments and in particular Pigment Red 254 are commonly used in high performance durable applications that call for bright, chromatic colors. Pigment Yellow 120 (a benzimidazolone pigment) and Pigment Orange 43 (a perinone pigment) have shown to be suitable in some durable applications as they exhibit a higher degree of light and weatherfastness over other organic pigments of the same color space. Since the mid-1950’s, the quinacridone family of organic pigments have been a staple in color matching for durable applications. General characteristics of this group of pigments include good heat resistance and light stability.
Matching a custom color for a durable application may require blending several of the pigment types mentioned above. A manufacturer of custom colors for polyolefin durables must keep the fastness and heat resistance performance of all components in mind when formulating. Studies show that the use of higher concentrations of pigment is beneficial and improves the light stability of polyolefins, but this depends upon the type of colorants used. Pigment levels should be optimized via the color matching process and subsequent performance evaluation in order to ensure that enough colorant is present to aid in confining UV absorption to the immediate surface of the durable. [4]
Polyolefins are intrinsically unsuitable for outdoor durable applications since the will easily photo-
oxidize in exterior conditions. However, their combination of low cost, ease of processing, and recyclability continues to promote research into effective methods of photo stabilization of polyolefins. Adequate pigment levels will afford some protection from UV radiation to the host polyolefin. UV stabilizers and antioxidants, however, need to be added to the durable in order to ensure long term performance in outdoor environments. There is usually negligible to no protection of colorants from photo degradation with these same polymer additives.
A full discussion of the mechanisms by which various light stabilizers and anti-oxidants protect a polyolefin durable matrix is beyond the scope of this paper. However, much has been documented regarding the effectiveness of the sterically hindered amine light stabilizers (HALS) in polyolefins. A combination of low and high molecular weight HALS has shown to be particularly effective [5]. Likewise, the synergy between such a UV stabilizer combination and long term heat stabilizer additives such as a phenolic anti-oxidant can ensure a durable performs through its expected life cycle.
Example
The color requested was a bright golden yellow for use in an injection molding grade of high density polyethylene (HDPE). Color was to be supplied in a concentrate form, no greater than 4% by weight of the end part. The end application was body panels for recreational vehicles. The end parts could have anywhere from very light to heavy exposure to exterior conditions over the lifetime of the vehicle.
Several color match trials were completed over the course of a month (see Table 1 for individual trial sample components). The initial match (04-106) contained two yellow pigments. Pigment Yellow 109 and Pigment Yellow are both advertised to have good fastness properties in polyolefins. The 04-106 sample also contained titanium dioxide and a standardized stabilizer package found to be suitable for other colors in the same application. This initial match had an unacceptable cost associated with it.
In order to attempt to reach an acceptable cost, Pigment Yellow 109 was substituted with modified Pigment Yellow 183, an azo pigment. This pigment was advertised to have good fastness properties in HDPE and costs less than Pigment Yellow 109. The initial color match with P.Y. 183 resulted in a sample (04-108) with adequate color but insufficient opacity. Pigment levels in 04-108 were increased to match the opacity of the 04-106 sample. This resulted in a sample (06-107) that ended up with approximately 40% more pigment than that found in 04-108.
A variant of the 04-106 sample with increased UV stabilizer (HALS-1) was created to check the efficacy of the standardized stabilizer package. A variant of the 04-108 sample with a modified UV stabilizer package 04110 was created to check for any pigment-stabilizer synergy. A second type of UV stabilizer was added to the 04-110 sample (HALS-2). The HALS-2 additive is a lower molecular weight species.
All samples were evaluated in an Atlas Ci65 xenon arc weatherometer to check for weatherfastness in an accelerated test. The test method selected was SAE J1960, a method commonly used in the evaluation of automotive exterior parts. Samples were inspected at intervals of 500 kJ/m2 until a color shift within sample sets was discovered. At that point, one sample from each sample set was recovered from the xenon arc at every 500 kJm• up to 2500 kJ/m2. Figures 1 through 4 exhibit the appearance of sample sets at 0, 1500, 2000, and 2500 kJ/m• exposure.
Color shifts were measured on a color spectrophotometer. The resultant CIELab color values and observations from sample inspection can be found in Table 2.
Several points can be made upon review of the test results:
Summary
This paper has examined some basic design considerations for coloring and stabilizing exterior durable applications where polyolefins are to be utilized as the bulk component. There is a large palette of colorant chemistries to choose from, each with positive and (potentially) negative features. Special care must be taken when selecting pigments for a custom color blend so that the final color will meet all lifetime performance criteria for a specific durable. Adequate levels of pigment in a durable polyolefin matrix can provide some protection from the negative effects of exposure to ultraviolet radiation, but addition of UV stabilizers and anti-oxidants should be considered a requirement for extended exposure.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to acknowledge Mir L. Ali and Dr. Richard Abrams of the Ferro Corporation for their contributions and support.
References
1. Davis, A.; Sims, D. Weathering of Polymers. Applied Science Publishers, London, 2 (1983).
2. Jaffe, E.E. “Organic Pigments.” Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Fourth Edition, Volume 19, Kirk-Othner, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 51 (1996).
3. Christie, R.M. “Pigments for Plastics.” Plastics Additives: An A-Z Reference, G. Pritchard, ed. Chapman & Hall, London, 491 (1998).
4. Davis, A.; Sims, D. Weathering of Polymers. Applied Science Publishers, London, 122 (1983).
5. Zweifel, H. Stabilization of Polymeric Materials. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 83 (1997).
Key Words
Pigment, polyolefin, UV, stabilizer.


![]()
Polyolefins and FlexPackCon
Nano Layer Film Effects
Recent Advances in Polyolefins Technology
Your Link to Networking
Bulletin Board
Plastics Info from the Library
Book Bag
Board Minutes
Technical Article
Section Meetings January 12, 2010 February 21-24 March 8 April 19 May 10 |
Section Officers
President – Jeff Applegate
Blackwell Plastics
5606 Cavanaugh Street, Houston, TX 77021
713.643.6577 • Jeff.Applegate@blackwellplastics.com
Vice President – Kurt Hayden
Greene, Tweed & Co.
281.765.4500 • khayden@gtweed.com
Vice President – Tom Walsh
GL Noble Denton
281.558.7180 • tj_walsh@sbcglobal.net
Treasurer – Terry Vermaas
Caravan Ingredients
281.381.5755 • tvermaas@caravaningredients.com
Secretary – Harish Sangani
Poly Clean Technologies
832.595.9660 • harishsangani8@msn.com
Councilor – Donna Davis
ExxonMobil Chemical Company
5200 Bayway Drive, Baytown, TX 77522-5200
281.834.2036 • donna.s.davis@exxonmobil.com
Executive Committee Liaison – Scott Owens
Chemtrusion
713.675.1616 • sowens@chemtrusion.com
Committee Chairpersons
Advertising – Suzanne Biggs
281.240.0202 • sbiggs@tpcplastic.com
Education – Shawn Smith
832-618-1500 • ssmith@vertecpolymers.com
Golf Outing – Lynette Russo
281.481.9100 • lynnette@bapoly.com
Housing – Emery Jorgensen
713.827.1455 • emery@jorgensonmachinery.com
Newsletter – Tom Walsh
281.558.7180 • tj_walsh@sbcglobal.net
Membership – Dave Ressler
713.329.9955, x202 • Dave@independentplastic.com
Past President – Donna Davis
281.834.2036 • donna.s.davis@exxonmobil.com
Polyolefins 2010 – Don Witenhafer
979.693.6836 • witenhafer2@cs.com
Program Chair – Robert Portnoy
281.834.2899 • robert.c.portnoy@exxonmobil.com
Public Interest & Special Events – Joe Nelson
281.363.1757 • joe.nelson.1757@hotmail.com
Technical Program – Kurt Hayden
281.765.4500 • khayden@gtweed.com
Board Members
Terry Vermaas – 281.381.5755
tvermaas@caravaningredients.com
William Talbott – 281.218.6305
whtalbott@cs.com
Emery Jorgensen – 713.827.1455
emery@jorgensenmachinery.com
Paul Banks – 281.578.3159
paulbanks@fsicorp.com
Mike McMahon – 281.681.2500
mmcmahon@nfm.net
Don Witenhafer – 979.693.6836
Witenhaferd@cs.com
Rajen Patel – 979.238.2254
rmpatel@dow.com
Dave Ressler – 713.329.9955, x202
Dave@independentplastic.com
Tom Walsh – 281-558-7180
tj_walsh@sbcglobal.net
Ayush Bafna – 979.238.9060
aabafna@dow.com
Shawn Smith – 832.618.1500
ssmith@vertecpolymers.com
Web Content/Section Coordinator
Suzanne Biggs – 281.240.0202
sbiggs@tpcplastic.com